Hi Alexandre, 2008/4/2, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Right, forgot about that one. But I am still sure he would accept a > > "perfect" full featured and beautiful written pulseaudio driver. What he > > doesn't wants at all is wasting precious Wine developer time on creating > > one in his Wine git repository. And having it rot there because in 1-2 > > years all of todays pulseaudio proponents will complain how broken > > pulseaudio is and how much better this "yet another audio system 2.0" is > > and why Wine _needs_ to implement that one. > > > What I really want is for all the people who are clamoring for yet > another driver to pitch in and start fixing the alsa driver instead. > > Once this is done and we have demonstrated that we can actually make one > driver work 100% correctly, then we can consider adding another one. Apart from the horrible waveout playback code that was directly copied from wineoss, and to a lighter degree the wavein code is there anything seriously broken in winealsa? Nothing comes to mind at the moment.
Cheers, Maarten.