On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, TheBlunderbuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > marco wrote: > > I looked into it. > > And there are some options. > > > > I can make a separate package of gecko that I can make it a > > dependencie of wine. > > Problem is people have to know where to find it or the get stuck. > > > > I can also make the package and make it not a dependencie on wine but > > the the people don't know it exist. > > > > And I can just put it in the wine package. > > > > I think this is the best option in this case. Its the easiest option > > because people only have to download en install one package. > > > > marco > > > This sounds good to me, but lets not compartmentalize wine too much, > like Debian. > Who wants to find out that you need so many wine* packages in order to > get something to work? > > >
Agreed, but I don't think wine, wine-dev, and wine-gecko is too much, especially considering that wine-gecko rarely changes... - Austin
