On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:32:10PM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > Jan Zerebecki wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:11:17AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > >> Where did our buzilla admins go? 3 weeks and nothing is changing!
> If we have only one bugzilla admin and we can not get any response > from that admin for the 4!!! weeks - REGARDLESS what the reasons are, we > need more admins period. In case of these component changes I felt that there was too much controversy (and no final proposal where the only response was "yes"; this paired with that some bugzilla admins wanted me to have an -devel approved list of changes) for me to do changes to bugzilla before waiting some more. (Though some delay can probably be attributed to the fact that I am currently without Internet on weekdays, outside of work.) Anyway no part of that was in any way urgent. > Sorry, but I expect more people to be involved and having appropriate > access. Also if some key person decides to take a vacation, then he/she > better notify the list. I feel honored to be titled a key person of the Wine project, but contrary to some belief I'm not the only bugzilla admin. Dan Kegel ( who according to a recent mail from himself might be unaware of his permissions ;) ), Jeremy Newman and Tony Lambregts are also bugzilla admins. If anyone would like to do things that need bugzilla admin permissions, one can post a reasonable request for those permissions to -devel. Usually one can get changes made to bugzilla that need admin by posting an _exact_ and detailed request to -devel and achieve general agreement. ( And I'll also probably stop ignoring component requests :) when the current component changes are done. ) That being said, I do think that we don't need more bugzilla admins, there is just not that much work to be done that really needs those permissions. Jan
