On Sunday 30 December 2007 02:04:16 Dan Kegel wrote: > Has anybody else been confused by this? > When submitting an app to the appdb, I'm often flummoxed > by what to put in the license field. I'm usually > looking for something that means > "Closed source, free to download, but not redistributable" > (like e.g. http://labs.adobe.com/misc/terms_of_use.html ) > but the only choices > are: Retail, Open Source, Freeware, Demo, Shareware. > > "Freeware" might be the closest of the bunch, but it implies GPL or > at least the ability to redistribute binaries > (i.e. the other meaning of the word Free). >
That's a good point; I didn't think about what freeware implied when making the choices. > Is there a way to make this clearer? Maybe "nonredistributable freeware"? > - Dan What about 'free to use'? Alexander N. Sørnes
