On Friday 25 May 2007 07:24:13 Kai Blin wrote: > > TRACE("pInput->pBuffers[0].cbBuffer is: %ld\n", > > - pInput->pBuffers[0].cbBuffer); > > + pInput->pBuffers[input_token_idx].cbBuffer); > > ret = SEC_E_INVALID_TOKEN; > > If you change the index of the token buffer, could you please fix the trace > accordingly? > > > + WARN("no SECBUFFER_TOKEN buffer could be found\n"); > > + ret = SEC_E_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL; > > + goto isc_end; > > } > > Is that intentional? According to the developer's guide, "[y]ou should > report a warning when something unwanted happens, and the function cannot > deal with the condition." > This is something the calling application screwed up, so I think a TRACE > should be sufficient.
Looks like the patch was already applied. I've sent a patch. Kai -- Kai Blin WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/ Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin Samba team member http://us1.samba.org/samba/team/ -- Will code for cotton.
pgpXm2GOV0GOZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature