On 12/03/07, Erich Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that the allocated memory should be the size of the resource multiplied by 4 (instead of adding 4).
What makes you think that?
IIRC the +4 there is for dodgy applications reading just past the end of the surface, but that line could do with a comment in either case.
I've dug around a bit to see if This->resource.size was just allocated incorrectly but that does not appear the case. So, if someone could confirm or deny that this is a typo problem then I'd really appreciate it.
Could you look into my comment in bugzilla? I'll probably write a test for that either way, but it's probably quite a bit faster for you to check if what I posted there makes any difference.
