Hi, Juan Lang wrote: >> Ignoring VT_ERROR just masks a previous error. >> > > Hm.. are you sure? These are input arguments, not results. This isn't > the only app that gets further with this patch. See also bug 6166. > > I guess a test case is the only answer. > I've tested it and we really shouldn't return E_INVALIDARG in this case so your patch is good.
Thanks, Jacek