James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That was the original plan, but I had some concerns about whether or not > Alexandre would take this or not. When Rob Shearman tried to get these > in last year, Alexandre asked him why it was necessary. At the time Rob > said that without that call, the icons that docked were only 1 pixel > wide. Now that isn't the case--without the call the icon width is > perfectly fine, but docking isn't as reliable. Besides, doing an XSync > is part of the canonical recipe for sending X events. Regardless, you've > got a valid point--it does seem a little odd that this isn't part of > patch #5. I think I'll try to work this in for the next update of these > patches.
XSync is very bad on remote links, and it shouldn't be necessary. If it behaves better with it there's a problem somewhere. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
