"Nick Burns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok so that makes more sense about MSVCRT -- but if it is using cdecl -- > shouldnt that use WINAPIV?
CDECL would be more appropriate. > I did not see anything forcing a cdecl calling convention (other than > the spec file). And I dunno how to modify the spec file to add in more > attribs. cdecl is the default, that's why it's not specified. > So, should I finish this patch (e.g. catch every single callable > function and put the attrib on it) > Or, should I send the simple 99% patch first for WINAPI/WINAPIV > (removing meaningless redefs) -- I would probably ignore msvcrt for > the first patch Eventually of course we have to catch every function, but redefining WINAPI is already a good start. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
