[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/046196.html > > > > > > > >>It's OK that most people don't have fontforge installed, that just > >>means that people who can't cope with compiling from source and can't > >>satisfy all the required dependencies to create a working binary > >>shouldn't do it. They need to use a prepackaged one from a > >>confidential source who knows what is needed and how to resolve the > >>dependencies. > >> > >> > > > > > >Perhaps because there is NO binary available on > >list of http://www.winehq.org/site/download
> Then they can check their distributions source package tree (pkgsrc, > ports, etc.) or binary tree (which compliments pkgsrc, ports, etc. and > is compatable.) > > I mean, come on, can it be that hard to look in ports? If distribution is 4 years old, wine is also. Distributions works good enough, but 4 year old is little different. Or have you different opinion?
