On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:45:09AM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Currently: > > configure:10975: gcc -m32 -o conftest -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -Wall > > -I/opt/kde3/include/artsc -I/opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/gnome/l > > ib64/glib-2.0/include conftest.c -lartsc -L/opt/kde3/lib64 -ldl -lartsc > > -lpthread -L/opt/gnome/lib64 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 -l > > glib-2.0 >&5 > > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.0.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: > > skipping incompatible /opt/kde3/lib64/libartsc.so when searchi > > ng for -lartsc > > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.0.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: > > cannot find -lartsc > > > > > > If I remove it, it does not find /opt/kde3/lib/libartsc.so because it is > > not in the search path. > > So we just do not detect it now, and do not detect it after removing it. > > That sounds reasonable. I don't think we want to try to guess the > paths (or if we do, then we should get rid of the config script > completely, that's a broken concept anyway).
I agree here. Ciao, Marcus
