Alexandre Julliard schrieb:
Peter Beutner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Any reasons given?Stability is the obvious reason. And also of course the fact that we have most of the code we need in ntdll already and none of it in wineserver.
Yupp most of the code maybe already in ntdll. But imo it is quite as ugly, from a design point of view, to call ntdll functions from inside the ntoskrnl. It should be the other way around, shouldn't it?
