Am Sonntag, 28. August 2005 18:31 schrieb Alexandre Julliard: > Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi Alexandre, > > > > anything wrong with this patch ? > > Well, the resource id is 1, so loading it with 0x65 is certainly not > going to work. Were you planning to change the resource too?
Hi, looks like i was confused by LoadLibraryEx. I found now that when buildin and native version of a dll are present and nothing for the load order is specified LoadLibraryEx loads the buildin version as long as LOAD_LIBRARY_AS_DATAFILE is not specified. But when LOAD_LIBRARY_AS_DATAFILE is specified it loads the native version. Can this behavoir be change to load the same dll independend of LOAD_LIBRARY_AS_DATAFILE ? Bye Stefan
