On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:13:46AM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote: > On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote: > [...] > >>>So LPSTORAGE16 would be more fitting I think. > >> > >>You mean in the documentation? > > > >In the documentation I guess it is ok. > > Hmm, now I see that IStorage16 and LPSTORAGE16 are defined in > dlls/ole32/ifs.h and the structures they point to probably don't have > the same layout as their 32bit equivalents. So it would probably make > more sense to refer to those types in the documentation. Would the > attached patch be ok?
The structs have the same source layout (same function order, same arguments), but different calling conventions (32 stdcall vs 16 bit). I have to define them differently in WINE at least. Its ok. > (LPOLECLIENTSITE16 is not defined yet in ifs.h or elsewhere but I guess > that will come) When it is needed ... the program I have currently does not need further OLE handholding. Ciao, Marcus
