On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 21:00 +0000, Oliver Stieber wrote: > > > > Ah, that's different. That'd actually require using > > Gtk/Qt which we cannot > > do, the best we can get is to look like them. > > > What's the problem, licensing, integration or > thread-safety (I know QT isn't thread safe)
Well all those *could* be problems, but the real problem is that the Windows widget toolkit and GTK/Qt are too different, you can't map between them. > I may have a look at that too, it would be useful if > QT/GTK could use some of the existing Windows > accessibility software. No, that's not what I meant. Implementing OLE accessibility would mean that Win32 apps on Wine appear to in native tools like at-poke. It wouldn't mean you could use win32 accessibility software to access native apps. > I was thinking about going on a fund finding mission, > or at least trying to find someone who wants to pay > for an initial integration, it shouldn't be too hard > as most companies are no where near their requirements. Good luck! thanks -mike
