Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ...and in fact, Alexandre, wouldn't it be better to have _some_ apps > broken under Wine on FreeBSD than a completely broken Wine on FreeBSD > for all apps?
Nope. What matters is not so much how many apps run today, but that we have a design that will allow at some point in the future to run all possible apps. We shouldn't compromise on a design that guarantees that some apps will *never* run just because it runs more apps today. Besides, a completely broken Wine is the best way to ensure that someone starts worrying about the issue <g> -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
