Troy Rollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Doesn't the list in VIRTUAL_FirstView hold all that is needed? If we reserve > the whole lot, it seems to me that the only parts that would need to be added > in there would be the parts that are below the 0xc0000000 boundary and were > allocated before we get in to claim the range.
No, because we can't currently allocate a view in the middle of another one, which we would need in order to load Win9x native dlls. > On related matters, looking at the code that calls mmap yesterday, I noticed > that a VirtualAlloc with MEM_RESERVED (the flag to reserve a range of virtual > addresses under windows) does not use the MAP_NORESERVE flag (the flag to > prevent the system from allocating swap space for the mapped range) - is > there a reason for this? No real reason no, this could be changed. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
