Dear Christoph Lohmann,
I guess you are talking about the fact, that the packages are lightyears away of upstream. But, why don't you just use webkit2 instead? this should be a much more secure default. Sincerly, Kai Lemke Am 29.04.2016 um 15:59 schrieb [email protected]: > commit 6e3450a047c5f7eda300f68814f7b1dfd499119e > Author: Christoph Lohmann <[email protected]> > Date: Fri Apr 29 15:59:24 2016 +0200 > > Add a nice notice about the state of webkit. > > diff --git a/surf.suckless.org/index.md b/surf.suckless.org/index.md > index 92ba94f..4da4df8 100644 > --- a/surf.suckless.org/index.md > +++ b/surf.suckless.org/index.md > @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ Links > * Mailing List: `[email protected]` > ([Archives](http://lists.suckless.org/dev)) > * IRC channel: #suckless at irc.oftc.net > > +Note On Webkit Versions > +----------------------- > +Compile your own webkit or expect hell. The packaging of webkit is pure > +insane. > + > Development > ----------- > surf is actively developed. You can [browse](http://git.suckless.org/surf) > its > >
