I find ‘requireStyleResolver()’ a little confusing. My first expectation is
often that a method is an imperative command on the receiver, so I first read
'requireStyleResolver()’ as mandating that the document now requires a
StyleResolver, rather than referring to the need of the caller.
In a previous codebase I’ve worked on we used ‘acquire’ as a term of art for
lazy creation (as a synonym for get, with an inherent connotation that doing so
may nontrivial).
StyleResolver& acquireStyleResolver();
cheers,
G.
On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Why don't we call it requireStyleResolver() instead?
>
> I’m warming to this idea. Maybe we can use “require” as a term of art,
> analogous to the way we use “create”, to mean “create if not already created”.
>
> -- Darin
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
