On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > What do you think of these names instead? > > StyleResolver* optionalStyleResolver(); > StyleResolver& requiredStyleResolver();
+1, much clearer and the pointer vs reference makes it even more so. Perhaps enough so that the required prefix could be dropped: StyleResolver* optionalStyleResolver(); StyleResolver& styleResolver(); _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
