On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know that there was consensus that every port had to be > updated at the same time; in fact Balazs said Qt and EFL already clear > the cache. > Yes; the implication I took from the feedback on the bug was that if they can't all be made hermetic, they the ones that were already hermetic should be made consistent with the non-hermetic ones (which seems insane to me). I think you should just land the change for Chromium and let others > update their ports as needed. I don't disagree with you, but I do need an r+. Feel free to provide it :) > The value in reduced flakiness and more predictability outweighs anything > else in my book. Test coverage that you can't explain or rely on doesn't > count for much to me. > Amen. -a
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
