On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Elliott Sprehn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Dirk Schulze <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I would like to ask if there are objections to implement the canvas > Path object. > > > > Do we have metrics on how often people already have things named Path? > All other canvas objects have a prefix like CanvasGradient and > CanvasPattern, this thing seems inconsistent and more likely to break > existing pages. > > Dirk, given the fact that you quite logically referred to this as “the > canvas Path object” when mentioning it to us, and the fact that both > CanvasGradient and CanvasPattern objects exist, CanvasPath sure does seem > like a nice name for this. Someone should make that suggestion on the > WebApps mailing list! > > A difference though is that the path object doesn't have to be associated with a canvas. It is/will be useful with other features such as SVG as well. I feel uneasy with the generic name too; maybe a DOM/HTML/JS prefix is better.
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
