On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote: >> That seems like a reasonable approach to gathering usage data indirectly, so >> I'd say that type of information satisfies the policy as written. If you >> wanted to take that type of approach to other prefixed features, I doubt I >> would object in most cases. As I understand the policy, it's just asking for >> a reasonable effort to gather data relative to what we know about the >> feature. Perhaps you and other readers of the policy see it as demanding an >> unreasonable level of work, but I don't think it does. > > Maybe it's just the tone of the wiki page. It speaks about "arguing > extensively" and "proofs". Maybe after this discussion I'll make an > editing pass trying to tone down the language and reflect some of this > discussion.
As discussed, I've updated https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures to be a bit more friendly and to incorporate some of the recent discussion we had on this mailing list. Please let me know if you have any feedback. Thanks, Adam _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
