2011/10/12 Alexey Proskuryakov <[email protected]>: > > The issues that I see are: > > - Immaturity that's manifesting itself even in the name. You can't really ask > someone to meaningfully review a spec when its scope is so unclear.
What about the scope is unclear? I feel that the Scope section of the spec and the draft charter outlines what we hope to address. > > - Spec development process that ignores feedback. Multiple people who want > this feature (including one of spec editors) were aware of feedback but > didn't act on it. We had consensus on webkit-dev that the name was bad I was indeed aware of your feedback (that you felt the name was unclear, as far as I understood it), but after discussing during a WG meeting, we haven't thought of a better name. If you have any suggestions, I'm sure all would be open to an improved name. I apologize for not publicly acknowledging that we have not yet addressed the issue you've raised. I have opened an issue on your behalf: http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/24 Again, the goal is to attempt to gather feedback from developers at this stage, with work done behind a flag so as to reduce any possible negative impact on WebKit. The hope is that we will learn more. Perhaps we'll come up with a better name too! _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
