On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 12:54:35 +0100 Sebastian Wick <sebastian.w...@redhat.com> wrote:
> ... > I think a more useful thing to do would be to add this restriction (an > interface cannot have an event and a request with the same name) to > the documentation and to wayland-scanner. > Also: an event and request with the same name would probably confuse anyone using WAYLAND_DEBUG. But: Would changing wayland-scanner to prevent this be backward compatible? Can't someone somewhere already have an event/request pair with the same name in their own private protocol extension?
