Hi, Thanks for asking, a membership for Qt would would be much appreciated! I'm probably the best point of contact.
I've read through the document (v5) and it makes sense to me. Acked-by: Johan Helsing <[email protected]> Qt has interest in the project both as a compositor toolkit and as a client toolkit. I'm really excited for a clear submission process, and I hope it will lead to increased co-operation and compatibility across toolkits and compositors. Br, Johan Helsing ________________________________ From: Mike Blumenkrantz <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 16:35 To: Simon Ser <[email protected]> Cc: Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]>; Roman Gilg <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Drew DeVault <[email protected]>; Daniel Stone <[email protected]>; Jonas Ådahl <[email protected]>; Derek Foreman <[email protected]>; Carlos Garnacho <[email protected]>; Johan Helsing <[email protected]> Subject: Re: wayland-protocols scope and governance Hi, I've been following along on this thread, and I really appreciate that you've reached out to me. The current document seems reasonable to me. It will be a positive for the ecosystem to have a clearly-defined method of proposing and stabilizing new protocols for adoption. I'm not quite as active in the Wayland space as I have been historically, but EFL/Enlightenment does have interest in joining this community and I'm still probably the best point of contact at this time. Regards, Mike PS. The email address you used for Derek is no longer active (it hasn't been for years) and you should likely check with him on IRC for a more up-to-date address and/or interest. On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:17 AM Simon Ser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: [Cc'ing more people] > > Points of contact I had in mind: > > > > - KWin: Roman Gilg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > - Mutter: Jonas Ådahl <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > - Weston: Pekka Paalanen > > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > > Daniel Stone <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > - wlroots: Drew DeVault <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Simon Ser > > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > I think it would make sense to include this initial list in a MEMBERS > > file in the upcoming wayland-protocols patch series that adds this > > governance document. > > > > Thoughts? > > Sounds good to me! > > Prodding toolkit projects for people would be good, and also > Enlightenment. Hi all, We've been discussing for a while about wayland-protocols governance. You can find the latest proposal at [1]. We're discussing about the initial list of members. Would Enlightenment, Qt and GTK be interested in being initial members as well? Feedback is welcome. Thanks, [1]: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2019-October/040919.html Simon
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
