On Friday, November 9, 2018 3:01 PM, Albert Vaca <[email protected]> wrote: > Simon, > > Thanks for the clarification. I found the wording a bit confusing, but if > that's > the wording already in use then I agree we should stick with it.
Yeah, that's the motivation behind the protocol: consistency. I was also confused when I first read the core Wayland protocol, it takes time to understand why it's built like this, but it does make sense in the end. ;) > That said, you have my +1 on your proposal. Sweet > What do we need to do in order to move this forward? I see the proposal has > been > up for some months but didn't get much attention. > > If it is approved, I can probably make it happen on the KDE side, but it would > be nice have input from other compositors. I'd really love to have some KWin guys have a look at it. If that can't happen, I'll bump it and it'll go through the normal wlr-protocols review process. Do you know if there is anyone from the KDE side interested in reviewing this? Thanks, Simon _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
