On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:49:37 +0100
Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Here's a take v2 of the series, with the following changes:
>  - don't trim trailing NULL entries from the wl_interfaces* array
>  - updated tests - separate patches to ease review, to be squashed
> 
> On the question of why, despite the aesthetics these patches make the
> generated files actually understandable by a human being...

Hi Emil,

on the previous round, this concern was raised:

On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:36:06 +0000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote:

> But that being said, my worry is that we don't actually control the
> compilation environment for the scanner output. Scanner output
> currently compiles with '-pedantic -ansi -Wall -Wextra' (at least,
> when inline is defined). This patch changes that requirement, and I
> worry that - like previous discussions on changing scanner output -
> that upgrading Wayland would lead to people hitting compilation
> failures.

What is your rationale for that being a non-issue?


Thanks,
pq

Attachment: pgpoIY5a5Lf4G.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel

Reply via email to