On 2018-05-17 1:14 PM, Daniel Stone wrote: > That's fine, but we would have to look at the trade-off: they would > have to drop functionality they use, in exchange for something which > is worse for them.
I guess I don't fully understand why it's worse for them. It should be functionally equivalent, albiet with a frame or two of the pointer being locked or unlocked at the incorrect time, which really doesn't matter. Implementing persistent locks using only oneshots is basically a single line of code afaict. -- Drew DeVault _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
