On 2018-03-19 4:42 AM, Eike Hein wrote: > How about: > > <entry name="client_side" value="1" summary="no server-side decoration"/> > <entry name="server_side" value="2" summary="server-side decoration"/>
+1 > And as description: > > "This interface allows a server to announce support for server-side > decorations and optionally express a preference for using them. > > A client can use this protocol to request being decorated by a > supporting server. +1 > If server and client do not negotiate the use of a server-side > decoration using this protocol, clients continue to self-decorate as > they see fit." The wording here is weird, and I want to avoid the word decorate. What the client does is not necessarily decorate. The reason why clients would need to decorate themselves at all is to give the user some visual cues for their true purpose: window management. We should just say this. I prefer my previous wording: > If the client chooses not to use server-side decorations, it is > responsible for its own window management operations. -- Drew DeVault _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
