Hi Jonas (and Pekka), How well does v4 address your requests?
-Matt On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:11:43 -0600 >> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jonas, Pekka, >>> >>> I have no objection to making the tweaks that Jonas mentions, but I'm >>> wary of messing with the form of this patch that Pekka already >>> stamped. Pekka, am I going to lose your consent as given in v3 if I >>> make changes along the lines Jonas requests? >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> you can downgrade my Reviewed-by to Acked-by in this case. I think >> doing the changes Jonas suggested are good, but I cannot give R-b >> without seeing the actual words. I'll just re-review then. > > Hi Pekka, > > Thanks. > > Jonas, > > I've overhauled the manpage write-up to try to incorporate your > suggestions. I wasn't clear about how to interpret a couple of the > things you wrote, but I think your main thrust was to remove > wordiness, get rid of redundancy, and always call attention to the > compatibility notes. I've tried that, mostly be re-ordering things so > that the natural flow of the documentation on parameter interpretation > that was in-place before my change now survives. Now it just reads > like: > > - *name* gives the socket to use (it's default value is wayland-0) > - $WAYLAND_DISPLAY replaces the default > - both *name* and $WAYLAND_DISPLAY are allowed to be absolute paths > - implication: if $WAYLAND_DISPLAY is absolute, then the connection > attempt will be too > - $WAYLAND_SOCKET overrides all of this, if it's set > > -Matt _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
