On Do, 30.11.17 12:09, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Hmm, what is this about? > > > > This is racy, as the session ID is not really reliably predictable, > > and is synthesized in different contexts in different ways, for > > example depnding on whether audit is enabled in the kernel it might be > > session-1.scope rather than session-c1.scope. > > Hi Lennart, > > this is the bit Martyn talked you in person some time ago, maybe Martyn > could refresh your memory?
Oh, did we? I don't remember, sorry! > > Piggy-backing on "login" is a bad idea. "login" is a text tool, and > > thus the PAM rules for it usually pull in some TTY specific PAM > > modules. YOu shoudl really use your own PAM fragment here, and > > configure only the bits you need. > > Ok. Is there any guide or example I could point people to, so that they > can write their own stuff correctly? Any example I could put into > Weston docs? Unfortunately PAM is awful and highly distro-specific. It's not really possible to write PAM snippets that work generically on all distros. Sorry. The distros even patch PAM differently, so that slightly difference constructs are available... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
