Hi Pekka, You can use it now in your work.
Best regards Emre Ucan Engineering Software Base (ADITG/ESB) Tel. +49 5121 49 6937 > -----Original Message----- > From: Pekka Paalanen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Montag, 4. September 2017 13:59 > To: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 2/2] compositor-drm: remove connector option > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:01:27 +0300 > Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:43:18 +0000 > > "Ucan, Emre (ADITG/SW1)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Remove the option, because it is hard to use. > > > Drm connector ids are hard to reach for users, > > > and they can change when kernel or device tree > > > is modified. > > > > > > If someone wants to enable just one output and > > > disable all others, he can set "require-output-config". > > > Then, all unconfigured outputs will be disabled > > > automatically. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emre Ucan <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > compositor/main.c | 2 -- > > > libweston/compositor-drm.c | 12 +----------- > > > libweston/compositor-drm.h | 6 ------ > > > man/weston-drm.man | 5 ----- > > > 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 24 deletions(-) > > > > > diff --git a/libweston/compositor-drm.h b/libweston/compositor-drm.h > > > index 0870719..6f37735 100644 > > > --- a/libweston/compositor-drm.h > > > +++ b/libweston/compositor-drm.h > > > @@ -98,12 +98,6 @@ weston_drm_output_get_api(struct > weston_compositor *compositor) > > > struct weston_drm_backend_config { > > > struct weston_backend_config base; > > > > > > - /** The connector id of the output to be initialized. > > > - * > > > - * A value of 0 will enable all available outputs. > > > - */ > > > - int connector; > > > - > > > > Hi, > > > > you are removing a field from struct weston_drm_backend_config, > > breaking ABI. This should be accompanied by a bump to > > WESTON_DRM_BACKEND_CONFIG_VERSION. > > > > Otherwise the patch looks good, but I managed to look in here too late. > > Since it is removing a command line option from Weston, I think this > > has to wait a bit more for the next development cycle. > > > > Acked-by: Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> > > Hi Emre, > > I'm doing some work which would benefit from this patch being in. Do > you want to revise patch 1/2 first or can I just take patch 2/2 and > land it with the required modifications? > > There's no hurry yet, I can just pick your patch in my development > branch which depends on the atomic modesetting series as well. > > > Thanks, > pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
