On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:39:52 +0800 Jonas Ådahl <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:28:45AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 25 July 2017 at 10:24, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Quentin proposed we add a scanner option > > > --visibility={static|compiler|export}. It would affect all the symbols > > > exported from the generated .c files as follows: > > > > > > - static: the symbols will be static. > > > - compiler: the symbols will get whatever the default visibility is > > > with the compiler, i.e. not explicitly static and not exported > > > - export: the symbols are exported (this the old behaviour, and will be > > > the default) > > > We are going to need an option to stop the exports anyway, and it seems > > > like we can piggyback on that solution for the problem underlying the > > > prefixing proposal as well. > > > > This sounds really good to me. > > > > Unfortunately, the release just went out last night without waiting > > for any of these patches (or even pinging to see what their status > > was?), so I guess we're not able to make xdg-shell stable for another > > cycle. >:( > > Well, we can still, just that anyone wanting to implement it in > parallel to xdg-shell unstable v5 would have to wait. > > > > > It's either that or just merge it post-beta anyway - which I wouldn't > > actually mind to be honest. > > That's an option too. I don't have any objections really. I could be ok merging it before the first RC. So are we sure enough that RC1 will give enough testing for the feature to be carved in stone? Thanks, pq
pgpnBCmUYEQAU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
