Hi, On 21 November 2016 at 20:59, Yong Bakos <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 21, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think removing the final word 'the dispatcher-specific >> implementation data' is a loss of precision/accuracy. If you don't >> mind reinstating that final word, I'll merge with my R-b. > > I have no problem with this. The reason why I changed it from "implementation > data" > to just "implementation" is because wl_closure_dispatch[1] passes an > implementation > as the first argument. I assumed this use was the specific intent, making the > description vague; but perhaps this is just one intent, and the description > should > be more general ("implementation data"). > > I'm fine either way (you know waaaay better than I do).
OK, fair enough! Pushed in its original form, thanks: To ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/wayland/wayland a26ed09..0242007 master -> master Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
