Hi Benoit, ----- Original Message ----- > On 07/06/2016 10:30, Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > [...] > > I disagree here, if anything we should keep the semantic states separate, > > we wouldn't want to have something like "no_shadow" or "no_border" as a > > semantic state like "maximized" or "fullscreen", do we? > > fullscreen and maximized are shortcut for drawing states: > > * fullscreen = no_border+no_shadow > * maximized = no_shadow+no_maximized_button+reduce_button > > what about activated state, that basically mean draw it as activated ?
No, a window being "active" remains true independently of the compositor running, whereas the "draw states" are a way to negotiate between the compositor and the application which one would be drawing some of the decorations/controls. A compositor may wish apps to be without drop shadow no matter the state, active, fullscreen, maximized, tiled or other. > This is too difficult to draw a line between draw states and "behaviors" > states, they are linked. The semantic states imply a well commonly accepted presentation (like fullscreen, all window controls are hidden), but the opposite isn't true, it's impossible to deduce a state from just the presentations flags. > I think we should think about window state once more :D I reckon the current states as defined in xdg-shell are commonly understood, established and accepted between environments, I don't see the need to change that. Cheers, Olivier _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
