On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:41:04AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 07:33:09PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:16:43AM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:42:44PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > > > 'wayland-scanner -v' (correctly) reports the program as named > > > > "wayland-scanner", but 'wayland-scanner -h' was inconsistent, referring > > > > to it as './scanner'. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <[email protected]> > > > > > > I guess we could also pass argv and use argv[0], but this works as well. > > > > can't we use program_invocation_short_name here? or is that to GNU-ish? > > We appear to be using that in weston, but I'm not seeing prior usage of > it in wayland. I'm guessing platform compatibility considerations are > stronger for wayland than weston, particularly for the scanner since it > needs to work everywhere we expect the protocols to be used; whereas in > weston if the demo clients don't work on certain platforms it isn't the > end of the world.
git grep _GNU_SOURCE shows it's defined in a number of source files, so I think we might as well go for it. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
