Hi,
On 20-05-16 12:28, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 20-05-16 02:29, Peter Hutterer wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336084
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]>
---
udev/90-libinput-model-quirks.hwdb | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/udev/90-libinput-model-quirks.hwdb
b/udev/90-libinput-model-quirks.hwdb
index 147fec2..22179bb 100644
--- a/udev/90-libinput-model-quirks.hwdb
+++ b/udev/90-libinput-model-quirks.hwdb
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ libinput:name:*AlpsPS/2 ALPS DualPoint TouchPad:fwversion:310
libinput:name:*AlpsPS/2 ALPS GlidePoint:fwversion:310
LIBINPUT_MODEL_ALPS_RUSHMORE=1
+libinput:name:*AlpsPS/2 ALPS DualPoint
TouchPad:dmi:*svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE5420*
+ LIBINPUT_MODEL_WOBBLY_TOUCHPAD=1
+
##########################################
# Apple
##########################################
It is likely a better idea to just mark all alps fwversion 300 devices as
wobbly,
talking about that I see that we only use the RUSHMORE flag to do WOBBLY
handling,
so we might drop that and just set WOBBLY on them instead.
To clarify to the best of my knowledge all alps touchpads of a given version are
created equally, they do not have fw difference per laptop model (or so I
believe),
so this likely applies to all of them, and doing this base don the fwversion
avoids needing it for LatitudeE??20 and likely others.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
