On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:33:07 +0200
Benoit Gschwind <[email protected]> wrote:

> I did a patches set that split the previous patch in severals steps. The step
> intend to help the review, and may not be logical. The patch is focuced on
> keeping the legacy configuration behaviours.
> 
> Benoit Gschwind (9):
>   wayland-backend: Create a basic config structure to use in new init
>     API
>   wayland-backend: fix memory leak of display_name
>   wayland-backend: use new config struture to create backend
>   wayland-backend: move config parsing in create_cursor
>   wayland-backend: define output configuration structure
>   wayland-backend: split wayland_output_create_for_config
>   wayland-backend: split init_backend
>   wayland-backend: put configuration structure in separate header
>   wayland-backend: move all parsing functions to weston
> 
>  Makefile.am              |   3 +
>  src/compositor-wayland.c | 187 +++++++++++------------------------------
>  src/compositor-wayland.h |  63 ++++++++++++++
>  src/main.c               | 211 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 src/compositor-wayland.h
> 

Hi,

I looked through patches 1-8 and I think they are acceptable, with some
changes I did:

- Patches 5 and 6 squashed plus fixing fullscreen scale value back to
  the hardcoded 1.

- Patch 7 rebased.

- Patch 8 needed moving the #include out of the extern "C".

Patch 9 is still to review.

Push:
   d62004e..639322a  master -> master


Thanks,
pq

Attachment: pgpUiFiyoXWWv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel

Reply via email to