On 2016-03-27 10:21 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > I would rather the effort be spent making secure interfaces, exactly > as you've described.
Agreed. I think it should be pretty straightforward: Client->Server: What features do you support? Server->Client: These privledged features are available. Client->Server: I want this feature (nonblocking) [compositor prompts user to agree] Server->Client: Yes/no [compositor enables the use of those protocols for this client] I can start to write up some XML to describe this formally. We can take some inspiration from the pointer-constraints protocol and I'll also rewrite that protocol with this model in mind. Does anyone see anything missing from this exchange? -- Drew DeVault _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
