Hi.
On 29.12.15 20:09, Dimitri NĂ¼scheler wrote:
Hello everyone
I sometimes wonder where people talk about concept level and philosophy.
At least Wayland has a big philosophy part - and it uses it to explain
itself in contrast to X.
I'm not much involved into it, but I think I understand some vital parts.
So far I understand it as a "graphics buffer and input redirection
protocol" and that's a very concept level perspective. The routers in
this "redirection network" are obviously the compositors.
I can't comment on Wayland itself. Philosophy does not have a monopoly
on concepts. Abstract mathematics has concepts too. This is what I
prefer because mathematical definitions are precise. Philosophical
definitions are not, so reasoning with them does no good.
_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel