On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 19:24:12 -0700 Bryce Harrington <[email protected]> wrote:
> We should be checking our scaled image height against the allocation > height rather than the allocation width. > > Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <[email protected]> > --- > clients/image.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/clients/image.c b/clients/image.c > index d28f221..4126305 100644 > --- a/clients/image.c > +++ b/clients/image.c > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ clamp_view(struct image *image) > image->matrix.x0 = allocation.width - sw; > } > > - if (sh < allocation.width) { > + if (sh < allocation.height) { > image->matrix.y0 = > (allocation.height - image->height * scale) / 2; > } else { R-b me, tested, and added one paragraph to the commit message explaining what it actually fixes. I wasn't sure without testing it. Pushed: 7628789..ae6f1bb master -> master Thanks, pq
pgprS4Jcx05z1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
