On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:16:11PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > Hi all, > > this looks fine to me personally. I'll point out some specific feature > cut-off points below, in case anyone wants to scream. > > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:42:53 -0700 > Bryce Harrington <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We're coming up to our next scheduled release. I've got a few scattered > > events and holidays but looking at my calendar, these dates look > > feasible and fit the timeframe we wanted: > > > > * 8/14 (Friday) - 1.8.91 (1.9 alpha) > > The end of big new features. I think this will cut: > - any changes or additions to protocols installed from Wayland > - introducing the proxy wrapper in libwayland-client > - require WAYLAND_DISPLAY, and the other env variable additions and > changes in Wayland > - building of libweston.so > > > > > * 9/01 (Tuesday) - 1.8.92 (1.9 beta) > > + Feature freeze > > Cuts: > - pointer lock, if patching only Weston > - Weston atomic > - Weston dmabuf > > > > > * 9/15 (Tuesday) - 1.8.93 (1.9 rc1) > > + Final freeze > > > > * rc2 only if necessary > > > > * 9/22 (Tuesday) - 1.9.0 (1.9 release) > > + Re-open trunk for 1.10 development > > To clarify, "cut" means the essential patches need to have landed, or > they need to wait for 1.10 developement to open. > > Would you agree on the categorization between big and minor features, > that is, alpha vs. beta?
Yes, works for me. So alpha is sort of a "Feature Frost". > > Notably, I'd like to shift from doing releases on Fridays to mid-week, > > but that's mostly just for my own convenience. If anyone prefers > > strongly that I stick with Friday releases let me know. > > > > I'm also shifting to calling the releases alpha/beta/rc instead of > > alpha/rc1/rc2, since we don't typically consider that second one to be > > an actual candidate for releasing. Again, I'm guessing no one but me > > cares, but if anyone wants to stick with the old approach let me know. > > Yeah, that's cool. > > Referring to > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2014-May/014955.html : > > - alpha: all big features landed, only minor, > contained features after this > > - beta: only bug fixes after this > > - rc: only critical bug fixes after this > > Seems like a good idea to keep on using, right? Yes, it seems to have worked well so far. So, same process really, just tweaks to the naming. Bryce > Thanks, > pq > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIVAwUBVcxgYyNf5bQRqqqnAQgePA//W2KS0niaBaNI/Q5cAqHKre6b4tXQ0hwb > sjJCcedLrxMyqqRMOz2VurY3ZslqPBqr1x+GUW9XDaE7EU7rYIP0qxxJ8kK6NCmr > t02p2r3tQH+Hw4GBmpIhXV4n5KDrc1YSqOzTh7xZoGREeTesegh3If8OzYtgjACG > 3Xkwu+CqPziM0uIhWfnhmXsTRrLacxi8Axz/ijzdjpVbHsWTzhz7MKxGBoY/1qgd > XSNWvIVtI4Mgk7mrwQuVrxfiSfKRJpgwycvvRvo2iP8dfF84rtrTNCTnfsPjmXO8 > o+i1Z8TC4eS7dmY/xiblbcERLDCVTRUR9n5Dn/y7yjYgsZoy0q1qqlbttdZKs7Zm > vHEn1IehYTVXvpGToMmcwt0jV6hKxNS81RrMqqdonZQJSJrUMuMFGVSIPJ1e/kEZ > rPgOuRBxtoxhSJzsBt2ECG7Db+fDTajnxtz3Jb6iL5yjy7s5304rn3WEkWASVW0B > mqnX3khaRg/Qx3gvbS4SOfGJlt5Jwa0xcBrLbAxv0aXOX0ZYzIFz+e7SjlGTS3t0 > cr8KELST9ZPjw/+9M44s04ueDA/owgvW9aBClNipLxf3Lnv14eG1X1RtDQUmYFUX > 0lnyfVdUZ1AtIgVdGurNgOexGjFd3tQu6WxMCZ2zNdQZTd/tWZAhnzQ+LYVNfpDc > YUp8+gm+Ino= > =bXEj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
