On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 02:19 -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > My issue with this is that you're tying two things together. You want > access to """a surface""", and you think you can do this by having > global cross-client objects and handles and such. I don't see a need > for this. We can just add a new protocol that does what we want. >
I don't understand your disagreement. The protocol you sketch out is exactly the same as the one Jonas sketched, only with different names (sandboxed_surface instead of xdg_foreign), and it is very much a global cross-client object handle. I obviously don't want the actual XdgSurface object from the other client, that would be insane. I just want a reference/handle/name for it in my client so that i can pass it as an argument to my_xdg_surface.set_parent() _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
