On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:19:09AM +0200, Marek Chalupa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Bryce Harrington <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  xwayland/selection.c | 10 +++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xwayland/selection.c b/xwayland/selection.c
> > index 572a0b5..451b915 100644
> > --- a/xwayland/selection.c
> > +++ b/xwayland/selection.c
> > @@ -119,8 +119,9 @@ weston_wm_get_incr_chunk(struct weston_wm *wm)
> >         } else {
> >                 weston_log("transfer complete\n");
> >                 close(wm->data_source_fd);
> > -               free(reply);
> >         }
> > +
> > +       free(reply);
> >  }
> >
> >  struct x11_data_source {
> > @@ -192,8 +193,10 @@ weston_wm_get_selection_targets(struct weston_wm *wm)
> >         }
> >
> >         source = malloc(sizeof *source);
> > -       if (source == NULL)
> > +       if (source == NULL) {
> > +               free(reply);
> >                 return;
> > +       }
> >
> >         wl_signal_init(&source->base.destroy_signal);
> >         source->base.accept = data_source_accept;
> > @@ -237,12 +240,13 @@ weston_wm_get_selection_data(struct weston_wm *wm)
> >         if (reply->type == wm->atom.incr) {
> >                 dump_property(wm, wm->atom.wl_selection, reply);
> >                 wm->incr = 1;
> > -               free(reply);
> >         } else {
> >                 dump_property(wm, wm->atom.wl_selection, reply);
> >                 wm->incr = 0;
> >                 weston_wm_write_property(wm, reply);
> >         }
> > +
> > +       free(reply);
> >  }
> >
> >  static void
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wayland-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
> >
> 
> Just wondering: does xcb_get_property_reply always return non-NULL? Because
> there's no check for that before dereferencing the reply.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marek Chalupa <[email protected]>

Thanks for the review.  You're right, those return values probably
should be checked.

The man page doesn't explicitly say NULL is returned, but it does
mention the need for error checking, and the example it provides
definitely does show a null pointer check.

I'll follow up with a separate patch to add those checks.

Thanks,
Bryce
_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel

Reply via email to