On 26 June 2015 at 19:25, Bill Spitzak <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am very much in favor of this, and posted earlier a further patch that
> uses this information to produce better protocol documentation.
>
> The above design is exactly correct (in particular the bitfield indicator is
> on the enumeration, not the argument).
Thanks!
Somehow I've completely missed those patches you sent (but I found
them now) - apologies for that. Your XSLT code makes slightly more
sense than mine, and I would be fine with either solution. However, my
patch in particular also exposes the "bitfield" information to the
documentation, and explains the attributes in chapter 4 ("Wayland
Protocol and Model of Operation").
I forgot to add my Signed-off-by to these three patches, but it
applies, so here you go:
Signed-off-by: Auke Booij <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
