On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:07:14AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:29:06 +0800 > Jonas Ådahl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Noted. It should be semi safe to push as long as it's on libinput > > master. Weston master can depend libinput master, can't it, Pekka? > > Ahhah, sorry, this question had stuck in my long-time backlog. > > I think Weston master can well depend on libinput master, if there is a > way to do a configure check for "libinput master". E.g. the same way > Weston can depend on libwayland 1.x.90 which basically means a dev > snapshot. > > If libinput does not provide for such a version check, it's a bit more > awkward... > > For general convience, I'd avoid depending on master, unless it's > important for e.g. testing the depended-on software or for weston's own > functionality. > > Hrm, looks like I just wrote an elaborate "whatever makes sense" > reply. :-) > > Strict policy either way is not good.
heh, fair call. If this comes up again I'm happy to do snapshot releases as required to satisfy the version checks. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
