On 30 July 2014 20:27, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually no. Binding writers are expected to write their own code > generator for their language, like wayland-scanner is for C. You > are expected to not use the static inline generated C functions.
Okay, that makes some amount of sense. But in that case, that should be documented. > Instead the functions actually exported by the library are the ABI. I guess that this is convention in C? > I would love to see documentation patches! Speaking of which, is there a reason the code samples don't show up correctly in the online documentation? > In fact, you inspired me to draw a picture, attached. Maybe that > could be integrated in the Wayland docs somehow. Yes, this would be helpful. > Only when those protocols a) become stable, and b) are actually > intended to be public and not specific to Weston. > > I think the latest move was wl_subcompositor. Got it. _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
