On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:11:20 -0700 Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:38:10PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > From: Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> > > > > Hi, > > > > this series replaces the first 5 patches from > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2014-March/013580.html > > > > Compared to the old series, this series carries the same 5 patches > > rebased on top of the current master branch. It adds a tiny fix > > (patch 4). > > > > The big thing added in this series is patch 7, which adds two new > > wl_viewport requests for setting the source rectangle and destination > > size separately. This will be needed by the Presentation extension, > > which classifies source rectangle as buffer state and destination size > > as surface state, hence going through different commit paths. Clients > > will need a way to set these separately. > > > > We now also define what it means if source rectangle is set, but > > destination size is not set, and vice versa. > > > > This patch series does not yet change the wl_surface.commit behaviour. > > > > When wl_scaler/wl_viewport eventually migrates to Wayland, my intention > > is to drop the wl_viewport.set request and the error codes. I guess > > this would also need to rename the global interface, which gives us > > the opportunity to change the interface style from factory to > > something else, if we want. > > Series looks good, the protocol change makes sense. Hi Kristian, thanks for merging this, but you didn't comment anything on the discussion about the 0x0 size and negative width/height. Are you happy with the current semantics, or did you just miss the discussion in this email thread? More importantly, should I be changing it before weston 1.5 goes into freeze? Btw. did you announce the 1.5 release schedule? I couldn't find it in the archives. Thanks, pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
