Yeah, this is fine with me. Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre <[email protected]>
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Giulio Camuffo <[email protected]>wrote: > 'close' is more consistent with the purpose of the event than > 'delete', and it is also c++ friendly, since 'delete' is a keyword. > --- > protocol/xdg-shell.xml | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/protocol/xdg-shell.xml b/protocol/xdg-shell.xml > index a2913c4..79a2831 100644 > --- a/protocol/xdg-shell.xml > +++ b/protocol/xdg-shell.xml > @@ -384,9 +384,9 @@ > </description> > </event> > > - <event name="delete"> > + <event name="close"> > <description summary="surface wants to be closed"> > - The delete event is sent by the compositor when the user > + The close event is sent by the compositor when the user > wants the surface to be closed. This should be equivalent to > the user clicking the close button in client-side decorations, > if your application has any... > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > wayland-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel > -- Jasper
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
